Search
The Octagon Sacramento Country Day School Sacramento, CA
Issue Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 Issue: Vol. XXXV, No. 8 Last Update: Thursday, May 31, 2012
Current Conditions Clear
Temperature: 44.6 °F
Wind Speed: 4 mph SE
Gusts: 5 mph ESE
Rain Today: N/A "

At-a-glance

- Cartoon by Nora Miller
Advertising
Anyone who regularly buys food at school knows that the lunch program has its share of problems. The food is expensive, supply is limited, and quality is mediocre. However, the lunch program does not deserve the level of criticism that it receives from the student body.

In a recent poll, students voiced a variety of complaints, some of them reasonable, some of them not.

By far the most common charge was that the food is of low quality, especially in relation to the price.

Certainly, you wouldn’t find food from our lunch program at an upscale restaurant, but do you really expect filet mignon? With only two food service employees and hundreds of students to feed, the focus has to be on quantity rather than quality.

And no one forces you to buy food at school. Get up 10 minutes earlier and make your own lunch if your objections are so strong.

Another popular complaint was that the food runs out quickly. We don’t doubt the accuracy of this criticism, but students must understand that two people simply do not have enough time to prepare enough food for all 471 students in the lower, middle and high school, and the school cannot afford to employ more workers.

If you want the food, get to the lunch room more quickly. And, teachers, please let students out promptly at 12:05 so that they can get there in time.

The last common criticism was that the food is unhealthy. However, everyone except the freshmen can remember last year’s experiment with healthier food. Food service director Jennifer Adams removed daily hot entrées, chips and cookies, and she beefed up the salad bar and soup and sandwich options. How did the student body respond to these changes? We didn’t buy the food! The drop in student purchases was so dramatic—Adams estimated around 20 percent—that the food program quickly reverted to selling junk food. And now students are once again clamoring for healthier food!

The food program stocks whatever sells well. Adams has a difficult job and follows student desires to the best of her ability in picking food. If those choices don’t satisfy you, then don’t buy the food. It’s that simple.

Back to the articles list

0 COMMENTS - Add your comment below

ADD YOUR COMMENT
Name
Email
Comments, recommendations or suggestions.
Submit

Staff View

Patricia Fels

Adviser
Email Me

Mollie Berg

Editor-in-Chief/Centerpoint Editor
Email Me

Christina Petlowany

Editor-in-Chief/News Editor
Email Me

Ian Cardle

Editor-in-Chief/Business Manager
Email Me

Zach Lemos

Copy Editor

Garrett Kaighn

Assistant Copy Editor
Email Me

Madeleine Wright

Feature Editor
Email Me

Margaret Whitney

Feature Editor
Email Me

Mary-Clare Bosco

Sports Editor
Email Me

Ryan Ho

Sports Editor
Email Me

Darby Bosco

Sports Editor

Jeffrey Caves

Editorial Editor
Email Me

Yanni Dahmani

Community Editor
Email Me

Connor Martin

Opinion Editor
Email Me

Kamira Patel

Graphics Editor
Email Me

Kelsi Thomas

Photo Editor

Will Wright

Photographer

Patrick Talamantes

Reporter
Email Me

Anthony Valdez

Reporter
Email Me

Micaela Bennett-Smith

Reporter

Morgan Bennett-Smith

Reporter

Skovran Cunningham

Reporter

Grant Miner

Reporter

David Myers

Reporter

Max Shukuya

Reporter

Emma Williams

Reporter
Email Me

View PDF's

Online Archives

There are currently 50 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.

Advertising